NBRFX vs. MRESX
NBRFX (Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund) and MRESX (Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, NBRFX returned 2.54%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for MRESX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. NBRFX charges 1.39%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MRESX.
Performance
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBRFX achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than MRESX's 19.16% return.
NBRFX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
MRESX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund | 16.55% | -2.14% | 5.02% | 11.70% | -27.35% | 47.87% | -1.34% | 31.06% | -5.31% | 6.99% |
MRESX Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund | 19.16% | 0.87% | 7.09% | 11.77% | -24.59% | 57.10% | -2.46% | 28.85% | -5.41% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBRFX and MRESX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between NBRFX and MRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBRFX vs. MRESX — Risk / Return Rank
NBRFX
MRESX
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBRFX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 2.50 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 7.82 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than MRESX's maximum drawdown of -40.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and MRESX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBRFX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.52% | -40.84% | -29.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.84% | -7.92% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -17.13% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.60% | -32.98% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.99% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -9.37% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.61% | +0.03% |
Volatility
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBRFX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.52% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 11.14% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 14.37% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 20.70% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 21.97% | -1.56% |
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MRESX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBRFX vs. MRESX - Dividend Comparison
NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than MRESX's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRESX Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund | 1.35% | 1.49% | 2.40% | 2.01% | 6.49% | 14.54% | 2.19% | 10.71% | 3.24% | 10.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NBRFX Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund | 1.61% | 2.07% | 1.94% | 2.11% | 12.58% | 7.76% | 2.03% | 4.73% | 6.98% | 6.43% | 14.86% | 9.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NBRFX and MRESX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MRESX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to NBRFX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs MRESX's -40.84%.
MRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBRFX and MRESX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer