PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRFX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NBRFX having a 11.05% return and NBSRX slightly lower at 10.59%. Over the past 10 years, NBRFX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


NBRFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
11.05%
6M
10.14%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
6.41%

NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
11.05%-2.14%5.02%11.70%-27.35%47.87%-1.34%31.06%-5.31%11.59%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRFX and NBSRX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2002

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between NBRFX and NBSRX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRFX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRFX
NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBRFXNBSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.71

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

11.66

-8.46

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRFX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBRFXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.06

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.83

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.82

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRFX drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than NBSRX's maximum drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRFX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRFXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-53.74%

-16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-10.03%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-16.28%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.60%

-25.39%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.56%

-34.07%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.40%

-0.94%

-6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-7.06%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.32%

+0.52%

Volatility

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) at 2.94%. This indicates that NBRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRFXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

2.94%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

10.48%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

13.19%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

16.14%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

17.49%

+2.85%

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRFX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NBSRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRFX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

NBRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than NBSRX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
1.83%2.07%1.94%2.11%12.58%7.76%2.03%4.73%6.98%6.43%14.86%9.29%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBRFX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBRFX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to NBSRX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRFX dropped -70.52% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRFX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer