NBR vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
NBR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBR vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 58.49% | -5.02% | -29.96% | -47.29% | 90.99% | 39.26% | -58.62% | 46.33% | -69.27% | -57.05% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBR achieves a 58.49% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NBR has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -14.04%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.
NBR
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 58.49%
- 6M
- 110.57%
- 1Y
- 106.33%
- 3Y*
- -10.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.72%
- 10Y*
- -14.04%
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBR vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
NBR
SCHG
NBR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.75 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.23 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.17 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.03 | +1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 3.54 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.75 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.57 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.79 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.79 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBR and SCHG is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NBR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.86% | 1.39% | 12.00% | 3.51% | 1.46% | 2.82% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
NBR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBR drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBR and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.51% | -34.59% | -64.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.58% | -16.41% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.70% | -34.59% | -53.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.73% | -34.59% | -64.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.85% | -13.34% | -82.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -5.22% | -47.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.87% | 4.78% | +14.09% |
Volatility
NBR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) has a higher volatility of 11.72% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.67%. This indicates that NBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBR | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.72% | 6.67% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.31% | 12.51% | +27.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.39% | 22.43% | +50.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.84% | 22.32% | +45.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.12% | 21.51% | +60.61% |