PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIX vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIX achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -6.13% return.


NBIX

1D
-10.08%
1M
-0.58%
6M
22.59%
YTD
17.61%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
12.71%
ALL TIME*
9.11%

GLDM

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.28%
6M
-16.53%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$263.44M$251.25M$317.77M
$278.93M$232.17M$211.02M

NBIX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
17.61%3.90%3.60%10.31%40.24%-11.14%-10.83%50.53%-28.30%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.13%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIX and GLDM is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBIX
NBIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBIX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBIXGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.88

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

1.90

+1.28

NBIX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIX and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIX drawdown since its inception was -97.21%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIX and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIXGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.21%

-26.27%

-70.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.90%

-26.27%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.89%

-26.27%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.89%

-26.27%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.08%

-24.94%

+14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.66%

-6.56%

-37.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

12.12%

-2.65%

Volatility

NBIX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 6.35%. This indicates that NBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIXGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.12%

6.35%

+7.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.01%

23.37%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.74%

27.92%

+5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.17%

18.39%

+14.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.18%

17.10%

+22.08%

Dividends

NBIX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIX nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIX has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to GLDM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIX dropped -97.21% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

NBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIX and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer