NBIS vs. SYF
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) and SYF (Synchrony Financial) are both stocks. NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while SYF operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past year, NBIS returned 362.13% vs 21.39% for SYF. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. SYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 177.59% return, which is significantly higher than SYF's -11.35% return.
NBIS
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 177.59%
- 6M
- 164.98%
- 1Y
- 362.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYF
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- -11.35%
- 6M
- -12.19%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
NBIS vs. SYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 177.59% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | -11.35% | 30.64% | 15.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and SYF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
NBIS:
$71.79B
SYF:
$25.38B
NBIS:
$3.17
SYF:
$9.85
NBIS:
73.19
SYF:
7.45
NBIS:
25.15
SYF:
0.71
NBIS:
69.73
SYF:
1.35
NBIS:
9.91
SYF:
1.66
NBIS:
$877.90M
SYF:
$19.92B
NBIS:
$420.60M
SYF:
$12.16B
NBIS:
-$52.78M
SYF:
$4.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. SYF — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
SYF
NBIS vs. SYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Synchrony Financial (SYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.03 | 0.78 | +7.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | 1.72 | +16.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. SYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum SYF drawdown of -66.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and SYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -66.37% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -27.61% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -16.40% | +4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -16.99% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.86% | 12.48% | +7.38% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. SYF - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 30.23% compared to Synchrony Financial (SYF) at 9.32%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | SYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.23% | 9.32% | +20.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.43% | 23.51% | +47.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.41% | 29.58% | +74.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 36.81% | +73.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 39.55% | +70.65% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. SYF - Dividend Comparison
NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYF Synchrony Financial | 1.64% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 2.51% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 1.45% | 0.72% |
Financials
NBIS vs. SYF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Synchrony Financial. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and SYF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to SYF (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs SYF's -66.37%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and SYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer