NBIS vs. CIFR
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) and CIFR (Cipher Mining Inc.) are both stocks. NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while CIFR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past year, NBIS returned 351.53% vs 522.82% for CIFR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 160.44% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 64.57% return.
NBIS
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 23.13%
- YTD
- 160.44%
- 6M
- 117.28%
- 1Y
- 351.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.20%
- 1M
- 18.20%
- YTD
- 64.57%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 522.82%
- 3Y*
- 119.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIS vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 160.44% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
CIFR Cipher Mining Inc. | 64.57% | 218.10% | -6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and CIFR is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024 | 0.49 |
Fundamentals
NBIS:
$67.36B
CIFR:
$9.84B
NBIS:
$3.17
CIFR:
-$2.33
NBIS:
65.42
CIFR:
53.38
NBIS:
9.30
CIFR:
13.78
NBIS:
$877.90M
CIFR:
$174.98M
NBIS:
$420.60M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
NBIS:
-$52.78M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
CIFR
NBIS vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBIS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 10.27 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | 20.60 | -2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | 4.86 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.19 | 0.16 | +3.02 |
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -97.16% | +38.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -51.38% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.58% | -7.61% | -9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.02% | -66.47% | +47.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.79% | 25.55% | -5.76% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 33.60% compared to Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) at 27.70%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.60% | 27.70% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.53% | 70.95% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.78% | 108.62% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.72% | 122.03% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.72% | 122.03% | -11.31% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIS nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NBIS vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and CIFR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to CIFR (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer