NBIL vs. CRWG
NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRWG.
Performance
NBIL vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 133.11% return, which is significantly higher than CRWG's -46.53% return.
NBIL
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -36.49%
- 6M
- 140.41%
- YTD
- 133.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.79%
- 1M
- -30.60%
- 6M
- -66.14%
- YTD
- -46.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.24M | $26.54M | $50.36M | |
| $101.88M | $87.37M | $73.33M |
NBIL vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 133.11% | -65.28% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | -46.53% | -77.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIL and CRWG is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIL vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIL vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -94.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and CRWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIL | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -94.04% | +15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.62% | -92.01% | +25.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.76% | -71.01% | +27.25% |
Volatility
NBIL vs. CRWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIL | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 216.76% | 192.54% | +24.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 216.76% | 192.54% | +24.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 216.76% | 192.54% | +24.22% |
NBIL vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRWG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIL vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison
NBIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 13.83% | 7.39% |
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIL and CRWG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 13.83%, compared with 0.00% for NBIL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.75% for CRWG.
Find the right allocation for NBIL and CRWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer