NBIL vs. KLAG
NBIL (GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and KLAG (Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NBIL is actively managed, while KLAG is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KLAG.
Performance
NBIL vs. KLAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIL achieves a 462.18% return, which is significantly higher than KLAG's 155.10% return.
NBIL
- 1D
- -7.17%
- 1M
- 83.16%
- YTD
- 462.18%
- 6M
- 280.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLAG
- 1D
- 8.19%
- 1M
- 49.84%
- YTD
- 155.10%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIL vs. KLAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIL GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 462.18% | 12.37% |
KLAG Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF | 155.10% | -1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIL and KLAG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIL vs. KLAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long KLAC Daily ETF (KLAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIL | KLAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 6.19 | -4.89 |
Drawdowns
NBIL vs. KLAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIL drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, which is greater than KLAG's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIL and KLAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIL | KLAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.87% | -42.37% | -35.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | 0.00% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.90% | -15.60% | -29.30% |
Volatility
NBIL vs. KLAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIL | KLAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.38% | 109.21% | +90.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 109.21% | +90.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.38% | 109.21% | +90.17% |
NBIL vs. KLAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than KLAG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIL vs. KLAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIL nor KLAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIL and KLAG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KLAG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KLAG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NBIL.
NBIL and KLAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NBIL and 0.75% for KLAG.
Find the right allocation for NBIL and KLAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer