PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIIX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIIX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than NBSRX's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIIX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


NBIIX

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.81%
YTD
5.20%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
10.02%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
6.76%

NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBIIX
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund
5.20%13.56%5.34%14.28%-22.00%13.85%13.89%27.89%-16.45%27.16%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIIX and NBSRX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2005

0.74

The correlation between NBIIX and NBSRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIIX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIIX
NBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBIIXNBSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.38

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

2.71

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

11.66

-11.21

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIIX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIIXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.06

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.83

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.82

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.59

-0.29

Drawdowns

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than NBSRX's maximum drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIIX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIIXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.08%

-53.74%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

-10.03%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-16.28%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.20%

-25.39%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.20%

-34.07%

-1.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-0.94%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-7.06%

-6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

2.32%

+2.38%

Volatility

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) at 2.94%. This indicates that NBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIIXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

2.94%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

10.48%

+5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

13.19%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

16.14%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.49%

-0.24%

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than NBSRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIIX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

NBIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBIIX
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%4.56%2.54%5.40%11.99%4.84%2.72%1.43%0.95%1.44%1.28%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIIX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIIX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to NBSRX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIIX dropped -61.08% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIIX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer