PortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and FSKAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
167.15%
464.26%
NBSRX
FSKAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBSRX:

0.32

FSKAX:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

NBSRX:

0.61

FSKAX:

0.83

Omega Ratio

NBSRX:

1.09

FSKAX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

NBSRX:

0.33

FSKAX:

0.51

Martin Ratio

NBSRX:

1.04

FSKAX:

1.94

Ulcer Index

NBSRX:

6.14%

FSKAX:

5.10%

Daily Std Dev

NBSRX:

17.97%

FSKAX:

19.74%

Max Drawdown

NBSRX:

-53.14%

FSKAX:

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

NBSRX:

-9.71%

FSKAX:

-8.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSRX achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -3.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 5.73%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.


NBSRX

YTD

-1.21%

1M

3.47%

6M

-5.69%

1Y

5.79%

5Y*

12.65%

10Y*

5.73%

FSKAX

YTD

-3.73%

1M

4.19%

6M

-5.62%

1Y

9.34%

5Y*

15.27%

10Y*

11.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBSRX vs. FSKAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBSRX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKAX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and FSKAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.32
0.48
NBSRX
FSKAX

Dividends

NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%9.97%10.09%0.46%0.60%0.66%0.49%0.63%0.65%0.68%0.74%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
1.13%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.80%2.06%1.66%1.82%1.96%1.63%

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.71%
-8.01%
NBSRX
FSKAX

Volatility

NBSRX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) is 5.86%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that NBSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.86%
6.89%
NBSRX
FSKAX