PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIIX vs. NINLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIIX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than NINLX's 22.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIIX has underperformed NINLX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while NINLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.


NBIIX

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.88%
YTD
5.27%
6M
1.01%
1Y
1.49%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
6.77%

NINLX

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.12%
YTD
22.52%
6M
25.24%
1Y
58.40%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBIIX
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund
5.27%13.56%5.34%14.28%-22.00%13.85%13.89%27.89%-16.45%27.16%
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
22.52%18.20%7.62%13.89%-20.22%26.42%27.14%24.92%-10.56%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIIX and NINLX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2005

0.70

The correlation between NBIIX and NINLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIIX vs. NINLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIIX
NBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NINLX
NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBIIXNINLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.14

2.92

-2.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

3.76

-3.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.47

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

6.23

-6.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.51

22.57

-22.06

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the NINLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIIX and NINLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBIIXNINLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.92

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.35

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Drawdowns

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, roughly equal to the maximum NINLX drawdown of -59.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIIX and NINLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIIXNINLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.08%

-59.95%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

-9.39%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

-26.46%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.20%

-28.71%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.20%

-44.43%

+9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-0.76%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-9.91%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

2.59%

+2.10%

Volatility

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) is 4.99%, while Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that NBIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NINLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIIXNINLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

5.37%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.79%

14.48%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

20.32%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

21.77%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

23.09%

-5.83%

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than NINLX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIIX vs. NINLX - Dividend Comparison

NBIIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBIIX
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%4.56%2.54%5.40%11.99%4.84%2.72%1.43%0.95%1.44%1.28%
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
3.47%4.25%0.92%0.25%3.76%6.40%1.62%2.85%14.51%5.19%1.42%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIIX and NINLX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NINLX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to NBIIX (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIIX dropped -61.08% vs NINLX's -59.95%.

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIIX and NINLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer