PortfoliosLab logo
NBIIX vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBIIX and COST is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NBIIX vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBIIX:

0.89

COST:

1.18

Sortino Ratio

NBIIX:

1.19

COST:

1.63

Omega Ratio

NBIIX:

1.17

COST:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

NBIIX:

0.91

COST:

1.46

Martin Ratio

NBIIX:

2.92

COST:

4.18

Ulcer Index

NBIIX:

4.78%

COST:

6.03%

Daily Std Dev

NBIIX:

17.55%

COST:

21.94%

Max Drawdown

NBIIX:

-58.88%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

NBIIX:

-0.41%

COST:

-6.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIIX achieves a 16.27% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NBIIX has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 6.04%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.78% annualized return.


NBIIX

YTD

16.27%

1M

6.89%

6M

13.37%

1Y

15.43%

3Y*

9.91%

5Y*

9.40%

10Y*

6.04%

COST

YTD

10.36%

1M

1.85%

6M

5.16%

1Y

25.72%

3Y*

30.73%

5Y*

28.85%

10Y*

23.78%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBIIX vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBIIX is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBIIX is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBIIX is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBIIX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBIIX is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBIIX is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBIIX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIIX and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NBIIX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

NBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NBIIX
Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund
3.92%4.56%2.53%5.39%11.99%4.85%2.72%1.43%0.96%1.44%1.27%1.85%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

NBIIX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIIX drawdown since its inception was -58.88%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIIX and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NBIIX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman International Equity Fund (NBIIX) is 3.26%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that NBIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...