PortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and BTMFX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBSRX:

0.96

BTMFX:

0.25

Sortino Ratio

NBSRX:

1.33

BTMFX:

0.40

Omega Ratio

NBSRX:

1.19

BTMFX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

NBSRX:

0.94

BTMFX:

0.16

Martin Ratio

NBSRX:

3.44

BTMFX:

0.46

Ulcer Index

NBSRX:

4.43%

BTMFX:

7.24%

Daily Std Dev

NBSRX:

17.54%

BTMFX:

17.14%

Max Drawdown

NBSRX:

-53.63%

BTMFX:

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

NBSRX:

-3.47%

BTMFX:

-9.31%

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has outperformed BTMFX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while BTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.


NBSRX

YTD

2.11%

1M

4.22%

6M

1.32%

1Y

15.83%

3Y*

17.01%

5Y*

17.06%

10Y*

11.75%

BTMFX

YTD

0.00%

1M

4.46%

6M

-9.24%

1Y

3.01%

3Y*

3.33%

5Y*

7.45%

10Y*

4.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Boston Trust Midcap Fund

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBSRX vs. BTMFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBSRX is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBSRX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTMFX is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTMFX is 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTMFX is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTMFX is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTMFX is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTMFX is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and BTMFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than BTMFX's 4.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
5.76%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.52%6.39%11.13%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
4.24%4.24%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.19%3.70%5.96%6.60%7.03%6.60%4.96%

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -50.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and BTMFX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NBSRX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) is 3.98%, while Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that NBSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...