PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. NBSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSRX achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than NBSSX's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has outperformed NBSSX with an annualized return of 14.41%, while NBSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.


NBSRX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.60%
YTD
11.64%
6M
17.51%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
14.41%

NBSSX

1D
0.20%
1M
6.28%
YTD
6.88%
6M
8.24%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
11.64%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
6.88%21.36%21.64%23.73%-31.74%19.85%24.45%28.50%-9.02%19.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and NBSSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1994

0.88

The correlation between NBSRX and NBSSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSRX vs. NBSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSSX
NBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSRXNBSSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

1.73

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.46

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.87

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.30

7.42

+4.88

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the NBSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and NBSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSRXNBSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.73

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.41

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.59

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.39

+0.20

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum NBSSX drawdown of -61.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and NBSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSRXNBSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-61.56%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-12.61%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-20.39%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-40.77%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

-40.77%

+6.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-13.03%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.18%

-0.86%

Volatility

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) is 2.80%, while Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that NBSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSRXNBSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

4.18%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

10.65%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

13.68%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.88%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

19.19%

-1.70%

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NBSSX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSRX vs. NBSSX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than NBSSX's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.11%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
9.15%9.78%0.19%0.59%0.05%19.35%5.37%12.78%9.08%8.32%9.59%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSRX and NBSSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSSX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to NBSRX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSRX dropped -53.74% vs NBSSX's -61.56%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSRX and NBSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer