NBIE vs. EFAV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NBIE is actively managed, while EFAV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBIE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

NBIE vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBIE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAV

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.83%
• 1Y: 9.78%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 5.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIE vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF	5.64%
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIE and EFAV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

NBIE vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 28
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIE vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBIE	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	0.54	+0.77

Drawdowns

NBIE vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and EFAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBIE	EFAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-27.56%	+21.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.07%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-4.77%	+3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.32%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBIE	EFAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.72%	10.32%	+9.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	11.79%	+7.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.72%	13.21%	+6.51%

NBIE vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBIE vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBIE and EFAV in my portfolio?

NBIE and EFAV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBIE or EFAV?

On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBIE or EFAV?

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NBIE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBIE or EFAV?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.

What is the main difference between NBIE and EFAV?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.20% for EFAV.