NBDS vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBDS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

NBDS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NBDS

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 26.62%
• 3Y*: 21.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -9.46%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBDS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	3.08%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	19.49%

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and ARMH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

NBDS vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 27
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBDS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBDS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	—	—

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.93%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBDS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.93%	-24.85%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	-16.34%	+12.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-7.72%	-1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBDS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.65%	122.02%	-95.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.96%	122.02%	-94.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.96%	122.02%	-94.06%

NBDS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBDS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

NBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.33%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBDS and ARMH in my portfolio?

NBDS and ARMH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NBDS or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBDS or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NBDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBDS or ARMH?

NBDS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between NBDS and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NBDS and 0.19% for ARMH.