PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBARX vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBARX vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate (NBARX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBARX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than AMECX's 6.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NBARX has underperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 7.13%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.51% annualized return.


NBARX

1D
0.35%
1M
2.13%
YTD
5.51%
6M
6.11%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
7.13%

AMECX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
6.34%
6M
7.37%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBARX vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate
5.51%15.67%9.16%9.25%-10.06%12.14%7.41%15.42%-3.81%11.18%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
6.34%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NBARX and AMECX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between NBARX and AMECX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBARX vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBARX
NBARX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NBARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NBARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBARX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBARX vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate (NBARX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBARXAMECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.62

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

9.88

+1.21

NBARX vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBARX and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBARXAMECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.24

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.83

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.80

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.72

+0.18

Drawdowns

NBARX vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBARX drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum AMECX drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBARX and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBARXAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-41.92%

+23.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-6.13%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-8.58%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-15.78%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.50%

-26.13%

+7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.23%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-4.45%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.62%

-0.23%

Volatility

NBARX vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate (NBARX) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBARXAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.06%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.20%

5.63%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

7.17%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.97%

9.45%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.23%

10.68%

-2.45%

NBARX vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBARX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBARX vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

NBARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than AMECX's 9.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.41%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%
NBARX
American Funds Retirement Income Portfolio - Moderate
4.90%5.69%3.25%3.46%5.04%3.48%3.97%3.87%3.89%2.50%2.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NBARX and AMECX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NBARX has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to AMECX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBARX dropped -18.50% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

NBARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBARX and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer