NAT vs. MNR
NAT (Nordic American Tankers Limited) and MNR (Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation) are both stocks. NAT operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while MNR operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate). Over the past year, NAT returned 158.85% vs -2.32% for MNR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NAT vs. MNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAT achieves a 92.92% return, which is significantly higher than MNR's 26.16% return.
NAT
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 69.73%
- YTD
- 92.92%
- 1Y
- 158.85%
- 3Y*
- 32.65%
- 5Y*
- 26.37%
- 10Y*
- -0.07%
MNR
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 28.60%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- -2.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NAT vs. MNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 92.92% | 54.57% | -33.63% | -0.45% |
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | 26.16% | -26.21% | 23.43% | -13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAT and MNR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
NAT:
$1.31B
MNR:
$2.14B
NAT:
$0.26
MNR:
$0.65
NAT:
24.05
MNR:
19.76
NAT:
0.30
MNR:
0.26
NAT:
3.91
MNR:
1.52
NAT:
2.87
MNR:
0.95
NAT:
$334.09M
MNR:
$1.19B
NAT:
$97.31M
MNR:
$632.55M
NAT:
$132.71M
MNR:
$541.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAT vs. MNR — Risk / Return Rank
NAT
MNR
NAT vs. MNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAT | MNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.02 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.77 | -0.01 | +8.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.30 | -0.03 | +26.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAT vs. MNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAT drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than MNR's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAT and MNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAT | MNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -34.70% | -55.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.45% | -27.08% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.93% | -15.78% | -16.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -14.85% | -29.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.14% | 14.33% | -8.19% |
Volatility
NAT vs. MNR - Volatility Comparison
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) at 6.31%. This indicates that NAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAT | MNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.50% | 6.31% | +10.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.44% | 21.65% | +8.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.22% | 27.92% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.43% | 28.69% | +22.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.15% | 28.69% | +29.46% |
Dividends
NAT vs. MNR - Dividend Comparison
NAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, less than MNR's 14.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | 14.22% | 17.57% | 18.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited | 10.05% | 10.47% | 16.00% | 11.67% | 3.59% | 3.55% | 15.25% | 2.03% | 8.00% | 21.54% | 16.31% | 8.88% |
Financials
NAT vs. MNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordic American Tankers Limited and Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NAT vs. MNR - Profitability Comparison
NAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a gross profit of 47.64M and revenue of 106.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.8%.
MNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 279.14M and revenue of 285.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.6%.
NAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported an operating income of 38.36M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
MNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation reported an operating income of -9.71M and revenue of 285.93M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.
NAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 106.46M, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.
MNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation reported a net income of -35.04M and revenue of 285.93M, resulting in a net margin of -12.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NAT and MNR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAT has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to MNR (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAT dropped -90.20% vs MNR's -34.70%.
NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAT and MNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer