MNR vs. HIW
MNR (Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation) and HIW (Highwoods Properties, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — MNR in REIT - Industrial, HIW in REIT - Office. Over the past year, MNR returned 20.90% vs -1.50% for HIW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNR vs. HIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNR achieves a 35.52% return, which is significantly higher than HIW's 11.44% return.
MNR
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 20.46%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIW
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- 12.16%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- -3.60%
- 10Y*
- 0.16%
MNR vs. HIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | 35.52% | -26.21% | 23.43% | -10.09% |
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. | 11.44% | -9.61% | 43.11% | 34.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNR and HIW is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MNR and HIW shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNR:
$2.31B
HIW:
$3.09B
MNR:
$0.68
HIW:
$0.55
MNR:
20.34
HIW:
50.30
MNR:
1.57
HIW:
5.04
MNR:
1.02
HIW:
1.31
MNR:
$1.19B
HIW:
$605.73M
MNR:
$632.55M
HIW:
$409.39M
MNR:
$541.72M
HIW:
$478.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNR vs. HIW — Risk / Return Rank
MNR
HIW
MNR vs. HIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) and Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNR | HIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | -0.04 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | -0.09 | +1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNR | HIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | -0.06 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.23 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
MNR vs. HIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNR drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum HIW drawdown of -63.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNR and HIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNR | HIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -63.47% | +28.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.08% | -34.03% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -58.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.53% | -20.38% | +10.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.72% | -14.58% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 16.89% | -2.86% |
Volatility
MNR vs. HIW - Volatility Comparison
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) at 6.99%. This indicates that MNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNR | HIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 6.99% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 22.75% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.26% | 26.53% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.82% | 30.21% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.82% | 30.50% | -1.68% |
Dividends
MNR vs. HIW - Dividend Comparison
MNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.24%, more than HIW's 7.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIW Highwoods Properties, Inc. | 7.25% | 7.75% | 6.54% | 8.71% | 7.15% | 4.40% | 4.84% | 3.88% | 4.78% | 3.46% | 4.90% | 3.90% |
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation | 13.24% | 17.57% | 18.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MNR vs. HIW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation and Highwoods Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MNR and HIW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNR has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to HIW (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNR dropped -34.70% vs HIW's -63.47%.
MNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNR and HIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer