MNR vs. HESM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM).

Performance

MNR vs. HESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MNR vs. HESM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation	32.00%	-26.21%	23.43%	-10.09%
HESM Hess Midstream LP	15.11%	0.56%	26.41%	7.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MNR : $1.84B HESM : $5.03B
EPS MNR : $0.00 HESM : $2.78
PS Ratio MNR : 1.49 HESM : 3.05
PB Ratio MNR : 0.78 HESM : 11.79
Total Revenue (TTM) MNR : $1.18B HESM : $1.62B
Gross Profit (TTM) MNR : $1.15B HESM : $1.21B
EBITDA (TTM) MNR : $525.41M HESM : $1.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNR achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly higher than HESM's 15.11% return.

MNR

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 7.53%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 6M: 13.07%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HESM

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 19.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MNR vs. HESM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNR

MNR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MNR Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MNR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HESM

HESM Risk / Return Rank: 38
HESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNR vs. HESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) and Hess Midstream LP (HESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNR	HESM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	-0.01	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.16	+0.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.02	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.03	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.36	-0.06	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNR vs. HESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the HESM Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNR and HESM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNR	HESM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14	-0.01	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.33	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between MNR and HESM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MNR vs. HESM - Dividend Comparison

MNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.07%, more than HESM's 7.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNR Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation	14.07%	17.57%	18.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HESM Hess Midstream LP	7.63%	8.41%	7.12%	7.50%	7.30%	6.93%	8.86%	6.89%	8.00%	2.93%

Drawdowns

MNR vs. HESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNR drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum HESM drawdown of -75.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNR and HESM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNR	HESM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.70%	-75.16%	+40.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.08%	-25.78%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.88%	-5.01%	-6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.77%	-11.92%	-2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.67%	13.65%	+1.02%

Volatility

MNR vs. HESM - Volatility Comparison

Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corporation (MNR) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Hess Midstream LP (HESM) at 3.90%. This indicates that MNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNR	HESM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	3.90%	+3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.76%	12.90%	+6.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.20%	26.75%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.22%	27.33%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.22%	39.04%	-10.82%

Financials