NASA vs. XDEF
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and XDEF (Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. NASA is actively managed, while XDEF is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDEF.
Performance
NASA vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -27.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEF
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -99.26%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -4.61% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and XDEF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and XDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -99.30% | +54.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.12% | -99.26% | +54.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -76.33% | +62.32% |
Volatility
NASA vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | XDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 139.03% | -72.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 139.03% | -72.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 139.03% | -72.40% |
NASA vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% |
XDEF Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and XDEF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
XDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.35% for XDEF.
Find the right allocation for NASA and XDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer