NASA vs. VRIG
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VRIG.
Performance
NASA vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -27.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -4.61% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and VRIG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
NASA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VRIG
NASA vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NASA | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 5.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 60.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 303.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -13.04% | -32.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.12% | 0.00% | -45.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -0.26% | -13.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
NASA vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.63% | 0.48% | +66.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 1.29% | +65.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.63% | 3.78% | +62.85% |
NASA vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VRIG's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.70% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and VRIG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.30% for VRIG.
Find the right allocation for NASA and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer