VRIG vs. EMNT
VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) and EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRIG returned 4.42%/yr vs 3.43%/yr for EMNT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRIG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EMNT.
Performance
VRIG vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than EMNT's 1.65% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EMNT
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
VRIG vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.79% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 0.24% |
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 1.65% | 4.74% | 5.79% | 5.84% | -0.57% | 0.11% | 2.08% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and EMNT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
EMNT
VRIG vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRIG | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 10.18 | 10.65 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 24.69 | 21.23 | +3.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.40 | 5.66 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 63.28 | 33.62 | +29.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 324.00 | 237.85 | +86.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRIG | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18 | 10.65 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.44 | 4.18 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 3.51 | -2.60 |
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and EMNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -2.28% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -0.13% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.78% | -0.73% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | -1.70% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | 0.00% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.23% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Volatility
VRIG vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.11%, while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) has a volatility of 0.16%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | EMNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.11% | 0.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 0.34% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49% | 0.41% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 0.83% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.80% | 0.86% | +2.94% |
VRIG vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRIG vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than EMNT's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF | 4.00% | 4.46% | 5.14% | 4.62% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRIG and EMNT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMNT has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRIG dropped -13.04% vs EMNT's -2.28%.
On 5-year performance, VRIG leads with 4.42% vs 3.43% for EMNT. On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VRIG has performed better with a 4.42% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VRIG.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.00% for EMNT.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.24% for EMNT.
EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.65 vs 10.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRIG and EMNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer