VRIG vs. LQDH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH).
VRIG and LQDH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VRIG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Sep 20, 2016. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014.
Performance
VRIG vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VRIG vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 0.92% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.20% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than LQDH's 0.22% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VRIG vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
LQDH
VRIG vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.22 | 1.66 | +3.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.83 | 2.41 | +4.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.22 | 1.37 | +1.85 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 1.76 | +4.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 52.58 | 8.91 | +43.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22 | 1.66 | +3.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.35 | 1.08 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.56 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and LQDH is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
VRIG vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than LQDH's 6.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.89% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 6.10% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and LQDH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -24.63% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.78% | -3.85% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | -7.08% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.73% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -1.70% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.76% | -0.67% |
Volatility
VRIG vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.18%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 1.54% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.36% | 2.25% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93% | 4.11% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 4.43% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 6.45% | -2.62% |