NASA vs. CANC
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while CANC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
NASA vs. CANC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -9.48%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANC
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 4.92%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 42.50%
- 3Y*
- 114.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 29.65% |
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | -0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and CANC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank
NASA
CANC
NASA vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASA | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.20 | -0.04 | +5.23 |
Drawdowns
NASA vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -22.08%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and CANC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -97.53% | +75.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -56.51% | +34.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -73.16% | +69.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
NASA vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | CANC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.27% | 23.25% | +38.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 280.04% | -218.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 280.04% | -218.77% |
NASA vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NASA and CANC have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
NASA vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 3.00% | 0.56% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and CANC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NASA and CANC have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CANC is Health & Biotech Equities.
Find the right allocation for NASA and CANC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer