CANC vs. JNJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).

CANC is an actively managed fund by Tema. It was launched on Aug 14, 2023.

Performance

CANC vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CANC vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	5.69%	42.92%	-5.37%	510.51%	-85.34%	-51.82%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	18.74%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	6.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANC achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 18.74% return.

CANC

• 1D: 4.66%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 6M: 27.93%
• 1Y: 52.46%
• 3Y*: 140.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JNJ

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -1.61%
• YTD: 18.74%
• 6M: 33.37%
• 1Y: 51.50%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 11.57%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CANC vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 90
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 93

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 94
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANC vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CANC	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.71	-0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	3.40	-0.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.52	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	4.55	-0.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	13.23	+0.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CANC vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANC and JNJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CANC	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.71	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.54	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between CANC and JNJ is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CANC vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than JNJ's 2.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.13%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%

Drawdowns

CANC vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANC drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANC and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CANC	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.53%	-50.67%	-46.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.40%	-8.42%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.41%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.19%	-1.66%	-54.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.91%	-11.90%	-62.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	4.04%	-0.43%

Volatility

CANC vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 4.48%. This indicates that CANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CANC	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	4.48%	+3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.34%	11.09%	+5.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.24%	19.14%	+8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	285.66%	16.68%	+268.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	285.66%	18.33%	+267.33%