NANC vs. UGA
NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. NANC is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NANC returned 22.07%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. NANC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
NANC vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
NANC
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
NANC vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 7.19% | 18.54% | 26.83% | 22.81% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 5.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between NANC and UGA is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between NANC and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NANC vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
NANC
UGA
NANC vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NANC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.17 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 9.39 | -2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NANC vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NANC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -86.59% | +65.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -18.96% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.94% | -26.68% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -18.05% | +14.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -36.69% | +34.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 6.43% | -3.41% |
Volatility
NANC vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) is 5.88%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that NANC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NANC | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 9.24% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 30.57% | -19.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 35.22% | -20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 34.45% | -17.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 37.22% | -20.35% |
NANC vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NANC vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF | 0.20% | 0.21% | 0.20% | 0.94% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NANC and UGA have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to NANC (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 22.07% vs 18.95% for UGA. On fees, NANC is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, NANC has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NANC is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
NANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
NANC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Subversive and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NANC and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer