NANC vs. QUS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NANC (Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NANC is actively managed, while QUS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NANC returned 23.55%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NANC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.

Performance

NANC vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.

NANC

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.13%
• 1Y: 26.05%
• 3Y*: 23.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUS

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 2.68%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: 17.65%
• 3Y*: 17.53%
• 5Y*: 11.08%
• 10Y*: 13.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANC vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NANC Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF	9.48%	18.54%	26.83%	20.79%
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	6.67%	14.13%	18.99%	14.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and QUS is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.84

The correlation between NANC and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

NANC vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NANC	QUS
Technology	41.5%	26.3%
Communication Services	15.1%	10.2%
Healthcare	10.5%	13.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	5.8%
Financial Services	7.7%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	9.2%
Industrials	5.5%	8.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.3%
Utilities	0.6%	3.6%
Energy	-	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

NANC vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 51
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

QUS

QUS Risk / Return Rank: 57
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANC vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NANC	QUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.95	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.81	-0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	2.59	-0.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	11.54	-2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NANC vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NANC	QUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	1.95	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	0.77	+0.61

Drawdowns

NANC vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and QUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NANC	QUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.94%	-33.78%	+12.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-6.85%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	-13.94%	-7.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.50%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-3.70%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	1.53%	+1.42%

Volatility

NANC vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NANC	QUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	1.78%	+1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.38%	6.66%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	9.09%	+4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	14.33%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	16.42%	+0.31%

NANC vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NANC vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NANC Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF	1.31%	1.38%	1.49%	1.57%	1.68%	1.27%	1.73%	1.81%	2.12%	1.86%	2.07%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NANC and QUS in my portfolio?

NANC and QUS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NANC or QUS?

NANC has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs QUS's -33.78%.

Which ETF is better, NANC or QUS?

On 3-year performance, NANC leads with 23.55% vs 17.53% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NANC or QUS?

Over the 3-year period, NANC has performed better with a 23.55% return vs 17.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NANC or QUS?

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NANC or QUS?

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

What is the main difference between NANC and QUS?

They also come from different issuers: Subversive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NANC and 0.15% for QUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.