PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONY vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONY vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -24.40% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -27.53% return.


CONY

1D
1.00%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
-24.40%
6M
-29.90%
1Y
-47.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
2.34%
1M
-15.24%
YTD
-27.53%
6M
-28.30%
1Y
-40.14%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONY vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
-24.40%-26.34%23.62%76.18%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-27.53%-11.19%104.45%38.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CONY and BITO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.70

The correlation between CONY and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONY vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CONYBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.86

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.76

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-1.29

+0.09

CONY vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is comparable to the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CONY vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONYBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.57%

-77.86%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-53.10%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.17%

-50.02%

-7.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.78%

-36.85%

+14.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.72%

31.11%

+8.61%

Volatility

CONY vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.64% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.60%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONYBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.64%

12.60%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.35%

34.26%

+10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.83%

44.05%

+13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.90%

55.02%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.90%

55.02%

+4.88%

CONY vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CONY vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 198.50%, more than BITO's 68.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
68.72%78.29%61.59%15.14%
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
198.50%192.07%155.66%16.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CONY and BITO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONY has higher volatility (15.64%) compared to BITO (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, BITO leads with -40.14% vs -47.70% for CONY. On fees, BITO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 12.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITO has performed better with a -40.14% return vs -47.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 198.50%, compared with 68.72% for BITO.

CONY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.95% for BITO.

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONY and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer