NAIL vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NAIL (Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NAIL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NAIL returned -17.64% vs 21.24% for FNGU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NAIL charges 0.99%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

NAIL vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAIL achieves a -13.15% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 3.96% return.

NAIL

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 25.39%
• YTD: -13.15%
• 6M: -27.97%
• 1Y: -17.64%
• 3Y*: -11.92%
• 5Y*: -9.97%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

FNGU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -12.41%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: -3.67%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAIL vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares	-13.15%	-32.82%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	3.96%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NAIL and FNGU is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.18

NAIL vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NAIL	FNGU
Consumer Cyclical	71.8%	9.6%
Industrials	19.1%	-
Basic Materials	8.6%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	60.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NAIL vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAIL

NAIL Risk / Return Rank: 9
NAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
NAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
NAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 16
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAIL vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAIL	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	0.35	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	0.87	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.11	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	0.36	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.45	0.85	-1.30

NAIL vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAIL and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAIL vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAIL drawdown since its inception was -93.75%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAIL and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAIL	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.75%	-61.30%	-32.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.85%	-59.55%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.18%	-27.36%	-47.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.87%	-22.25%	-21.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.36%	24.91%	+14.45%

Volatility

NAIL vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares (NAIL) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) have volatilities of 26.93% and 27.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAIL	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.93%	27.31%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.98%	50.15%	+11.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.92%	61.43%	+27.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.27%	79.93%	+7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.35%	79.93%	+9.42%

NAIL vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAIL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAIL vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

NAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NAIL Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shares	0.91%	1.55%	0.63%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.17%	0.35%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAIL and FNGU in my portfolio?

NAIL and FNGU have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAIL or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to NAIL (26.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAIL dropped -93.75% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, NAIL or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 21.24% vs -17.64% for NAIL. On fees, NAIL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, NAIL has been the lower-risk option at 26.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NAIL or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 21.24% return vs -17.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NAIL or FNGU?

NAIL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NAIL or FNGU?

NAIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between NAIL and FNGU?

NAIL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (300%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NAIL and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.