PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NACP vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NACP vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than ILCB's 11.56% return.


NACP

1D
0.14%
1M
8.57%
YTD
22.35%
6M
21.44%
1Y
44.11%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*

ILCB

1D
0.40%
1M
4.85%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.45%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NACP vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.35%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.56%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NACP and ILCB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.92

The correlation between NACP and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NACP vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NACP
ILCB

Technology

35.8%
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
11.7%

Communication Services

9.8%
11.4%

Healthcare

9.2%
8.6%

Industrials

8.7%
8.6%

Energy

5.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.8%

Utilities

3.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Technology

NACP
35.8%
ILCB
35.5%

Consumer Cyclical

NACP
11.1%
ILCB
10.1%

Financial Services

NACP
10.6%
ILCB
11.7%

Communication Services

NACP
9.8%
ILCB
11.4%

Healthcare

NACP
9.2%
ILCB
8.6%

Industrials

NACP
8.7%
ILCB
8.6%

Energy

NACP
5.0%
ILCB
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

NACP
3.6%
ILCB
4.8%

Utilities

NACP
3.4%
ILCB
2.3%

Basic Materials

NACP
1.5%
ILCB
1.8%

Real Estate

NACP
1.3%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NACP vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NACP vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NACPILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.43

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

3.14

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.18

14.46

+5.72

NACP vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NACP Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NACP and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NACPILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.38

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.64

+0.29

Drawdowns

NACP vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NACPILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-51.53%

+20.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.09%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-19.05%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.89%

-25.47%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-6.23%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.97%

+0.22%

Volatility

NACP vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.83%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NACPILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

2.83%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

9.11%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

12.01%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

17.12%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.16%

+0.53%

NACP vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NACP vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than ILCB's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.96%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NACP and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NACP has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ILCB (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.01% vs 13.55% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.03% for ILCB.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NACP and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer