NACP vs. BKLC
NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NACP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while BKLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NACP returned 16.01%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for BKLC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NACP charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKLC.
Performance
NACP vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NACP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than BKLC's 11.44% return.
NACP
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 22.35%
- 6M
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 44.11%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- —
BKLC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 28.60%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.35% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 41.37% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 11.44% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between NACP and BKLC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between NACP and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
NACP vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NACP
BKLC
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
NACP
BKLC
Consumer Cyclical
NACP
BKLC
Financial Services
NACP
BKLC
Communication Services
NACP
BKLC
Healthcare
NACP
BKLC
Industrials
NACP
BKLC
Energy
NACP
BKLC
Consumer Defensive
NACP
BKLC
Utilities
NACP
BKLC
Basic Materials
NACP
BKLC
Real Estate
NACP
BKLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NACP vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank
NACP
BKLC
NACP vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NACP | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.43 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 3.16 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.18 | 14.42 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NACP | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16 | 2.37 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.13 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
NACP vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NACP drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NACP and BKLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NACP | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -26.14% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -9.10% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.66% | -19.05% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.89% | -26.14% | -1.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.29% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -5.27% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.99% | +0.20% |
Volatility
NACP vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) at 2.95%. This indicates that NACP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NACP | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 2.95% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 9.13% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 12.10% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 17.16% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 17.44% | +1.25% |
NACP vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NACP has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
NACP vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
NACP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than BKLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, NACP and BKLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NACP has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to BKLC (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NACP dropped -30.96% vs BKLC's -26.14%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 16.01% vs 14.43% for BKLC. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 14.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.
NACP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BKLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for NACP and 0.00% for BKLC.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NACP and BKLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer