MZTI vs. CL
MZTI (The Marzetti Company) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MZTI in Packaged Foods, CL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, MZTI returned 0.54%/yr vs 4.21%/yr for CL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MZTI vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MZTI achieves a -32.69% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MZTI has underperformed CL with an annualized return of 0.54%, while CL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.21% annualized return.
MZTI
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- -32.69%
- 6M
- -30.23%
- 1Y
- -33.35%
- 3Y*
- -16.23%
- 5Y*
- -9.18%
- 10Y*
- 0.54%
CL
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.21%
MZTI vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MZTI The Marzetti Company | -32.69% | -2.93% | 6.10% | -14.02% | 21.59% | -8.26% | 16.75% | -7.88% | 39.22% | -6.99% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 10.27% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MZTI and CL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
MZTI:
$2.98B
CL:
$69.29B
MZTI:
$6.41
CL:
$2.58
MZTI:
17.00
CL:
33.37
MZTI:
1.93
CL:
8.62
MZTI:
1.54
CL:
3.35
MZTI:
2.86
CL:
477.90
MZTI:
$1.94B
CL:
$20.80B
MZTI:
$469.39M
CL:
$12.49B
MZTI:
$296.24M
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MZTI vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
MZTI
CL
MZTI vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Marzetti Company (MZTI) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MZTI | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.00 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.12 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.88 | -0.20 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MZTI | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | -0.10 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.17 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | 0.21 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
MZTI vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MZTI drawdown since its inception was -54.66%, smaller than the maximum CL drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZTI and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MZTI | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.66% | -58.91% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.74% | -18.64% | -24.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.47% | -29.05% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.22% | -29.05% | -19.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -29.05% | -19.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.51% | -17.54% | -28.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.65% | -11.24% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.76% | 11.29% | +6.47% |
Volatility
MZTI vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Marzetti Company (MZTI) is 6.38%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that MZTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MZTI | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 7.77% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.58% | 17.27% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.85% | 21.67% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 18.77% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 19.74% | +7.96% |
Dividends
MZTI vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
MZTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than CL's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.43% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
MZTI The Marzetti Company | 3.63% | 2.34% | 2.11% | 2.07% | 1.65% | 1.84% | 1.55% | 1.66% | 1.39% | 1.74% | 1.45% | 5.96% |
Financials
MZTI vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Marzetti Company and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MZTI vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
MZTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marzetti Company reported a gross profit of 107.22M and revenue of 453.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
MZTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marzetti Company reported an operating income of 46.58M and revenue of 453.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
MZTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Marzetti Company reported a net income of 37.06M and revenue of 453.37M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MZTI and CL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to MZTI (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZTI dropped -54.66% vs CL's -58.91%.
CL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MZTI and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer