MYMK vs. SPYG
MYMK (SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYMK is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. MYMK is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMK charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
MYMK vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMK achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.49% return.
MYMK
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
MYMK vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MYMK SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.99% | 0.65% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.49% | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMK and SPYG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMK vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
MYMK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYG
MYMK vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMK) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYMK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYMK vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMK drawdown since its inception was -2.22%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMK and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -67.63% | +65.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -5.71% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -24.28% | +23.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.48% | — |
Volatility
MYMK vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMK | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 17.22% | -15.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 21.36% | -19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 20.72% | -18.81% |
MYMK vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMK has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYMK vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
MYMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYMK SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMK and SPYG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for MYMK.
MYMK has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
MYMK is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMK and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for MYMK and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer