MXI vs. RSPM
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and RSPM (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - MXI tracks the S&P Global Materials Index while RSPM tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 10.43%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for RSPM. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPM.
Performance
MXI vs. RSPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than RSPM's 15.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXI having a 10.43% annualized return and RSPM not far ahead at 10.47%.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 28.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.38%
RSPM
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.58M | $1.75M | $2.67M | |
| $1.60M | $1.26M | $779.50K |
MXI vs. RSPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 10.45% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 15.29% | 6.90% | -1.30% | 8.32% | -9.95% | 31.21% | 22.77% | 25.11% | -14.75% | 25.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and RSPM is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.82 |
The correlation between MXI and RSPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. RSPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
RSPM
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
MXI
RSPM
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
RSPM
Industrials
MXI
RSPM
Consumer Defensive
MXI
RSPM
-
Technology
MXI
RSPM
-
Communication Services
MXI
-
RSPM
-
Energy
MXI
-
RSPM
-
Financial Services
MXI
-
RSPM
Healthcare
MXI
-
RSPM
-
Real Estate
MXI
-
RSPM
-
Utilities
MXI
-
RSPM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. RSPM — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
RSPM
MXI vs. RSPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.81 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 5.41 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. RSPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than RSPM's maximum drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and RSPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -61.18% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -12.32% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -27.19% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -27.19% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -39.84% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -4.53% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -8.76% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 4.12% | +0.79% |
Volatility
MXI vs. RSPM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF (RSPM) at 5.87%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | RSPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 5.87% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.38% | 14.48% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.95% | 18.80% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 20.24% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.90% | -1.48% |
MXI vs. RSPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. RSPM - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than RSPM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.73% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
RSPM Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Materials ETF | 1.77% | 2.06% | 2.04% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.83% | 1.50% | 1.28% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and RSPM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to RSPM (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs RSPM's -61.18%.
On 10-year performance, RSPM leads with 10.47% vs 10.43% for MXI. On fees, RSPM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPM has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPM has performed better with a 10.47% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
RSPM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.73% for MXI.
MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while RSPM tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.40% for RSPM.
MXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and RSPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer