MXI vs. SPHQ
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
MXI vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.38%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
MXI vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.54% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and SPHQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006 | 0.73 |
The correlation between MXI and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
SPHQ
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
MXI
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
MXI
SPHQ
Industrials
MXI
SPHQ
Communication Services
MXI
-
SPHQ
Energy
MXI
-
SPHQ
Financial Services
MXI
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
MXI
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
MXI
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
MXI
-
SPHQ
Utilities
MXI
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
SPHQ
MXI vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.92 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 12.48 | -5.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -57.83% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -8.90% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -16.57% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -25.04% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -31.60% | -7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -2.93% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -10.68% | -7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 2.07% | +2.12% |
Volatility
MXI vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.88%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 5.88% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 11.30% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 13.46% | +7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 16.59% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 17.91% | +2.51% |
MXI vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to SPHQ (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.46% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while SPHQ is S&P 500. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer