MXI vs. GNR
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while GNR is a Natural Resources fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for GNR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.
Performance
MXI vs. GNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has outperformed GNR with an annualized return of 11.38%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.31% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
GNR
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 29.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
MXI vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 10.87% | 28.68% | -8.27% | 2.95% | 10.20% | 24.73% | -0.03% | 16.49% | -13.19% | 22.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and GNR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between MXI and GNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MXI vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
GNR
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
MXI
GNR
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
GNR
Consumer Defensive
MXI
GNR
Industrials
MXI
GNR
Communication Services
MXI
-
GNR
-
Energy
MXI
-
GNR
Financial Services
MXI
-
GNR
Healthcare
MXI
-
GNR
Real Estate
MXI
-
GNR
Technology
MXI
-
GNR
-
Utilities
MXI
-
GNR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
GNR
MXI vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.19 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 12.20 | -5.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than GNR's maximum drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and GNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -51.37% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -9.20% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -21.15% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -25.66% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -48.59% | +9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -9.20% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -14.92% | -3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 2.40% | +1.79% |
Volatility
MXI vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 5.94%. This indicates that MXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | GNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 5.94% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 14.11% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 17.32% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 20.28% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.82% | -1.40% |
MXI vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than GNR's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF | 2.68% | 2.76% | 4.73% | 3.37% | 4.37% | 3.44% | 2.78% | 3.84% | 3.51% | 2.40% | 2.06% | 4.59% |
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and GNR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXI has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to GNR (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs GNR's -51.37%.
On 10-year performance, MXI leads with 11.38% vs 10.31% for GNR. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MXI has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.72% for MXI.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while GNR is Natural Resources. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.40% for GNR.
GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and GNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer