MVV vs. XTAP
MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MVV is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVV returned 6.86%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for XTAP. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
MVV vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly higher than XTAP's 11.19% return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 48.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
XTAP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
MVV vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 26.09% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 13.88% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 11.19% | 17.58% | 14.26% | 23.46% | -14.68% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and XTAP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between MVV and XTAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MVV vs. XTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVV
XTAP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MVV
XTAP
Technology
MVV
XTAP
Financial Services
MVV
XTAP
Consumer Cyclical
MVV
XTAP
Healthcare
MVV
XTAP
Real Estate
MVV
XTAP
Energy
MVV
XTAP
Basic Materials
MVV
XTAP
Consumer Defensive
MVV
XTAP
Utilities
MVV
XTAP
Communication Services
MVV
XTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
XTAP
MVV vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 4.67 | -3.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 8.08 | -5.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 2.28 | -1.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 15.52 | -12.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 82.64 | -73.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 4.67 | -3.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.77 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.81 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -22.13% | -63.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -1.42% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.80% | -11.83% | -32.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -22.13% | -23.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -3.46% | -17.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 0.27% | +4.87% |
Volatility
MVV vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.20%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 1.20% | +7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.69% | 3.15% | +19.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.22% | 4.69% | +26.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 14.54% | +25.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.37% | 14.41% | +27.96% |
MVV vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVV vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVV and XTAP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVV has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to XTAP (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 11.17% vs 6.86% for MVV. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVV.
MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVV and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer