MVV vs. TQQQ
MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 13.68%/yr vs 45.44%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
MVV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.09% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 13.68%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 26.09%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- 1Y
- 48.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 33.57%
- YTD
- 65.71%
- 6M
- 58.23%
- 1Y
- 145.30%
- 3Y*
- 69.92%
- 5Y*
- 29.86%
- 10Y*
- 45.44%
MVV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 26.09% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 65.71% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and TQQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MVV and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MVV vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MVV
TQQQ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MVV
TQQQ
Technology
MVV
TQQQ
Financial Services
MVV
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
MVV
TQQQ
Healthcare
MVV
TQQQ
Real Estate
MVV
TQQQ
Energy
MVV
TQQQ
Basic Materials
MVV
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
MVV
TQQQ
Utilities
MVV
TQQQ
Communication Services
MVV
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
TQQQ
MVV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 3.07 | -1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 3.19 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 4.08 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 13.38 | -4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 3.07 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.45 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.69 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.74 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -81.66% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -36.97% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.80% | -58.04% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -81.66% | +36.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -81.66% | +12.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.55% | -18.53% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 11.28% | -6.14% |
Volatility
MVV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 8.69%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 13.26% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.69% | 36.05% | -13.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.22% | 47.63% | -16.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.64% | 66.55% | -26.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.37% | 65.98% | -23.61% |
MVV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MVV and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
MVV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVV and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to MVV (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.44% vs 13.68% for MVV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.44% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MVV and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVV and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer