MVV vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MVV is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, MVV returned 44.27% vs 3622.12% for MULL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

MVV vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.73% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 780.13% return.

MVV

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 26.73%
• 6M: 22.00%
• 1Y: 44.27%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

MULL

• 1D: -26.45%
• 1M: 69.00%
• YTD: 780.13%
• 6M: 832.94%
• 1Y: 3,622.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	26.73%	3.48%	-12.67%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	780.13%	558.51%	-39.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and MULL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024	0.46

MVV vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVV	MULL
Industrials	24.8%	-
Technology	17.8%	66.7%
Financial Services	13.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	-
Healthcare	9.1%	-
Real Estate	7.3%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

MVV vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 46
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVV	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	25.24	-23.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	5.61	-3.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.71	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	69.24	-66.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	221.31	-212.69

MVV vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 25.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVV vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVV	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-72.29%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.68%	-53.09%	+35.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-26.45%	+24.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-20.52%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	16.58%	-11.43%

Volatility

MVV vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 9.48%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 74.91%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVV	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.48%	74.91%	-65.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.52%	119.83%	-96.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.88%	145.72%	-113.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	142.49%	-102.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.34%	142.49%	-100.15%

MVV vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVV vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.67%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVV and MULL in my portfolio?

MVV and MULL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVV or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (74.91%) compared to MVV (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, MVV or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 3622.12% vs 44.27% for MVV. On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVV or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 3622.12% return vs 44.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVV or MULL?

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVV or MULL?

MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between MVV and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (25.24 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.