MVV vs. IWDL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL).
MVV and IWDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. IWDL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value (200%). It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. Both MVV and IWDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MVV vs. IWDL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVV vs. IWDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 29.36% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 3.56% | 25.02% | 20.68% | 13.50% | -21.27% | 40.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than IWDL's 3.56% return.
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
IWDL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 26.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVV vs. IWDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MVV and IWDL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
MVV vs. IWDL — Risk / Return Rank
MVV
IWDL
MVV vs. IWDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVV | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.08 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 5.01 | -1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVV | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.79 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.46 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVV and IWDL is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MVV vs. IWDL - Dividend Comparison
MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MVV vs. IWDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than IWDL's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and IWDL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVV | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.54% | -37.95% | -47.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.85% | -23.92% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.53% | -37.95% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -8.63% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.70% | -10.90% | -9.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 5.15% | +1.82% |
Volatility
MVV vs. IWDL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) at 8.67%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVV | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 8.67% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.02% | 18.10% | +5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 33.75% | +9.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.66% | 30.32% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.32% | 30.24% | +12.08% |