IWDL vs. IWD
IWDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN) and IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value (200%), while IWD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWDL returned 15.88%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for IWD. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IWDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IWD.
Performance
IWDL vs. IWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDL achieves a 39.21% return, which is significantly higher than IWD's 20.56% return.
IWDL
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- YTD
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 64.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.33%
IWD
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 32.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $542.34M | $454.50M | $526.80M | |
| $52.17K | $113.62K | $51.97K |
IWDL vs. IWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 39.21% | 25.02% | 20.68% | 13.50% | -21.27% | 40.35% |
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 20.56% | 15.68% | 14.17% | 11.34% | -7.75% | 21.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDL and IWD is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IWDL and IWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDL vs. IWD — Risk / Return Rank
IWDL
IWD
IWDL vs. IWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWDL | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 4.58 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.08 | 19.60 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWDL vs. IWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDL drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum IWD drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDL and IWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDL | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.95% | -60.10% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -6.79% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.78% | -15.71% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.95% | -19.04% | -18.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.09% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -8.60% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.59% | +1.61% |
Volatility
IWDL vs. IWD - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) at 2.86%. This indicates that IWDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDL | IWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 2.86% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.84% | 8.65% | +8.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 11.35% | +12.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.22% | 14.81% | +15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.82% | 17.25% | +12.57% |
IWDL vs. IWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWD's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDL vs. IWD - Dividend Comparison
IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.69% | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.09% | 2.25% | 2.47% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IWDL and IWD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IWDL has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to IWD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWDL dropped -37.95% vs IWD's -60.10%.
On 5-year performance, IWDL leads with 15.88% vs 11.62% for IWD. On fees, IWD is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IWD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IWDL has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWD is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for IWDL.
IWD has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for IWDL.
IWDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWD is Large Cap Value Equities. IWDL tracks Russell 1000 Value (200%), while IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for IWDL and 0.18% for IWD.
IWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWDL and IWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer