PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVRL vs. MLPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVRL vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 38.78% return.


MVRL

1D
1.07%
1M
-2.36%
6M
-6.15%
YTD
-1.68%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
-6.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.96%

MLPR

1D
-0.51%
1M
10.57%
6M
25.92%
YTD
38.78%
1Y
38.96%
3Y*
31.97%
5Y*
32.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
32.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.36K$41.58K$38.04K
$67.59K$58.58K$80.08K

MVRL vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-1.68%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%21.71%66.40%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
38.78%9.83%31.57%35.87%41.04%57.33%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MVRL and MLPR is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between MVRL and MLPR has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVRL vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPR
MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MVRL vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVRLMLPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.74

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

7.79

-6.91

MVRL vs. MLPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVRL and MLPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVRL vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than MLPR's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and MLPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVRLMLPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-48.98%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-14.31%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-24.45%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.63%

-28.66%

-30.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.69%

-0.64%

-37.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.93%

-8.88%

-23.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.77%

5.02%

+3.75%

Volatility

MVRL vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) at 8.50%. This indicates that MVRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVRLMLPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

8.50%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.07%

17.13%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.69%

22.27%

+6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.54%

29.11%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.50%

33.65%

+3.85%

MVRL vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVRL and MLPR have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

MVRL vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.76%, more than MLPR's 8.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
8.88%10.85%9.57%10.08%7.49%10.69%4.21%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
20.76%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVRL and MLPR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVRL has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to MLPR (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs MLPR's -48.98%.

On 5-year performance, MLPR leads with 32.44% vs -6.76% for MVRL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MLPR has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 32.44% return vs -6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVRL and MLPR have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 20.76%, compared with 8.88% for MLPR.

MVRL is categorized as REIT, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%), while MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%).

MLPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVRL and MLPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer