PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVRL vs. BDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVRL vs. BDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly higher than BDCX's -8.64% return.


MVRL

1D
0.35%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
17.55%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
-8.17%
10Y*

BDCX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
-8.64%
6M
-8.85%
1Y
-13.87%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVRL vs. BDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-3.17%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%21.71%57.90%
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
-8.64%-10.42%15.32%35.33%-17.67%52.70%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MVRL and BDCX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between MVRL and BDCX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVRL vs. BDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BDCX
BDCX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVRL vs. BDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVRLBDCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

-0.52

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

-0.60

+1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.93

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.50

+1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.95

-0.88

+2.84

MVRL vs. BDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the BDCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVRL and BDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVRLBDCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

-0.52

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.09

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.46

-0.33

Drawdowns

MVRL vs. BDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than BDCX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and BDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVRLBDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-34.96%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-30.46%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.20%

-33.39%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.25%

-34.96%

-25.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.64%

-25.75%

-12.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.80%

-10.05%

-21.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.45%

17.06%

-9.61%

Volatility

MVRL vs. BDCX - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) have volatilities of 6.25% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVRLBDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

6.41%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

22.02%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.34%

26.90%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.54%

26.44%

+10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.63%

26.85%

+10.78%

MVRL vs. BDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVRL and BDCX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

MVRL vs. BDCX - Dividend Comparison

MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.77%, more than BDCX's 19.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BDCX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN
19.59%19.17%15.28%14.71%17.47%11.52%6.32%
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
20.77%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVRL and BDCX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDCX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to MVRL (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs BDCX's -34.96%.

On 5-year performance, BDCX leads with 2.33% vs -8.17% for MVRL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, MVRL has been the lower-risk option at 6.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BDCX has performed better with a 2.33% return vs -8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MVRL and BDCX have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 20.77%, compared with 19.59% for BDCX.

MVRL is categorized as REIT, while BDCX is Leveraged Equities. MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%), while BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%).

MVRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVRL and BDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer