PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVRL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVRL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.


MVRL

1D
1.21%
1M
0.86%
YTD
-2.82%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
-8.77%
10Y*

SCHD

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
17.72%
6M
17.25%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVRL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
-2.82%14.96%-3.45%12.30%-42.41%21.71%66.40%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.72%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%23.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MVRL and SCHD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020

0.67

The correlation between MVRL and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVRL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVRL
MVRL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVRL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MVRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVRL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVRL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVRLSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.40

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

5.35

-4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

12.94

-11.49

MVRL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVRL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVRL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVRLSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.25%

-33.37%

-26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.93%

-4.61%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.20%

-16.13%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.63%

-16.85%

-42.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.42%

-2.47%

-35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-3.31%

-28.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

1.90%

+6.19%

Volatility

MVRL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that MVRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVRLSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.92%

3.58%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

7.73%

+12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.42%

11.07%

+16.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.55%

14.36%

+22.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.59%

16.71%

+20.88%

MVRL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVRL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVRL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.90%, more than SCHD's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVRL
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
20.90%19.15%19.27%18.69%25.21%12.33%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.30%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVRL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVRL has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.71% vs -8.77% for MVRL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.71% return vs -8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVRL.

MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 20.90%, compared with 3.30% for SCHD.

MVRL is categorized as REIT, while SCHD is Dividend. MVRL tracks MVIS US Mortgage REITs Index (150%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVRL and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVRL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer