MVRL vs. BLDG
MVRL (ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. MVRL is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVRL returned -6.76%/yr vs 3.88%/yr for BLDG. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MVRL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
MVRL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 14.70% return.
MVRL
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- -6.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.96%
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $88.64K | $78.98K | $590.59K | |
| $67.59K | $58.58K | $80.08K |
MVRL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVRL ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN | -1.68% | 14.96% | -3.45% | 12.30% | -42.41% | 21.71% | 45.62% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 14.70% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVRL and BLDG is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MVRL and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVRL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
MVRL
BLDG
MVRL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.85 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | 6.52 | -5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVRL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -27.25% | -33.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -10.08% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.34% | -18.57% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -27.25% | -32.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.69% | -1.30% | -36.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.93% | -8.99% | -22.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | 2.86% | +5.91% |
Volatility
MVRL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.77%. This indicates that MVRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.18% | 3.77% | +6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.07% | 9.60% | +11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.69% | 11.53% | +17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.54% | 15.24% | +21.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.50% | 15.50% | +22.00% |
MVRL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVRL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVRL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.76%, more than BLDG's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.12% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
MVRL ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN | 20.76% | 19.15% | 19.27% | 18.69% | 25.21% | 12.33% | 5.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVRL and BLDG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVRL has higher volatility (10.18%) compared to BLDG (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 3.88% vs -6.76% for MVRL. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 3.88% return vs -6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVRL.
MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 20.76%, compared with 5.12% for BLDG.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVRL and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVRL and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer