MVRL vs. BLDG
MVRL (ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. MVRL is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVRL returned -8.72%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVRL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
MVRL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVRL achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 5.95% return.
MVRL
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -5.45%
- 1Y
- 11.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- -8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
MVRL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVRL ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN | -5.20% | 14.96% | -3.45% | 12.30% | -42.41% | 21.71% | 45.45% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.95% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVRL and BLDG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MVRL and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVRL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
MVRL
BLDG
MVRL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.02 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 3.60 | -2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 0.93 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.15 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.45 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
MVRL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVRL drawdown since its inception was -60.25%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVRL and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -27.25% | -33.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -10.08% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.20% | -18.57% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.25% | -27.25% | -33.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.93% | -2.76% | -37.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.81% | -9.23% | -22.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 2.86% | +4.65% |
Volatility
MVRL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN (MVRL) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.60%. This indicates that MVRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVRL | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 3.60% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.18% | 8.23% | +11.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.30% | 11.07% | +16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.55% | 15.26% | +21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.63% | 15.54% | +22.09% |
MVRL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVRL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVRL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
MVRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.21%, more than BLDG's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.72% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
MVRL ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Mortgage REIT ETN | 21.21% | 19.15% | 19.27% | 18.69% | 25.21% | 12.33% | 5.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVRL and BLDG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVRL has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to BLDG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVRL dropped -60.25% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.24% vs -8.72% for MVRL. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.24% return vs -8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MVRL.
MVRL has the higher dividend yield at 21.21%, compared with 5.72% for BLDG.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVRL and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVRL and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer