MVFG vs. POW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MVFG (Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVFG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. MVFG is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MVFG charges 1.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

MVFG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFG achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 34.20% return.

MVFG

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 4.35%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.86%

POW

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -8.71%
• 6M: 18.02%
• YTD: 34.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF	$371.03K	$675.22K	$638.87K
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.23M	$2.16M	$2.93M

MVFG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF	14.13%	-0.94%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	34.20%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFG and POW is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

MVFG vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MVFG

MVFG Risk / Return Rank: 56
MVFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MVFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MVFG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MVFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MVFG Martin Ratio Rank: 59

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MVFG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF (MVFG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVFG	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	—	—

Drawdowns

MVFG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFG and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVFG	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-28.02%	+12.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.15%	+21.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-5.60%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MVFG	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	34.35%	-15.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.21%	34.35%	-19.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	34.35%	-19.14%

MVFG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFG has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVFG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

MVFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MVFG Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained ETF	1.51%	1.90%	1.67%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVFG and POW in my portfolio?

MVFG and POW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVFG or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVFG or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for MVFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVFG or POW?

MVFG has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between MVFG and POW?

MVFG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.42% for MVFG and 0.75% for POW.