MVAL vs. PWV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MVAL (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF) and PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - MVAL tracks the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross while PWV tracks the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVAL returned 15.04% vs 27.69% for PWV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVAL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PWV.

Performance

MVAL vs. PWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than PWV's 15.98% return.

MVAL

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: -0.87%
• 6M: -1.04%
• 1Y: 15.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWV

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 6M: 15.58%
• 1Y: 27.69%
• 3Y*: 21.59%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 12.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVAL vs. PWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	-0.87%	14.17%	6.27%
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	15.98%	19.65%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and PWV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024	0.70

The correlation between MVAL and PWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MVAL vs. PWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL

MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 29
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 24

PWV

PWV Risk / Return Rank: 91
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. PWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVAL	PWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.92	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	4.21	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.52	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	6.86	-5.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	22.94	-20.08

MVAL vs. PWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the PWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and PWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. PWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum PWV drawdown of -49.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and PWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVAL	PWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.56%	-49.04%	+29.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.16%	-4.05%	-8.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.27%	-0.05%	-9.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.89%	-9.48%	+5.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	1.21%	+4.06%

Volatility

MVAL vs. PWV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) at 3.42%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVAL	PWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.42%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	7.04%	+2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	9.57%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	14.33%	+1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	17.15%	-1.76%

MVAL vs. PWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PWV's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVAL vs. PWV - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than PWV's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF	1.76%	1.75%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	1.73%	2.12%	2.08%	2.16%	2.29%	1.89%	2.66%	2.24%	2.34%	1.55%	2.35%	2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVAL and PWV in my portfolio?

MVAL and PWV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVAL or PWV?

MVAL has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to PWV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVAL dropped -19.56% vs PWV's -49.04%.

Which ETF is better, MVAL or PWV?

On 1-year performance, PWV leads with 27.69% vs 15.04% for MVAL. On fees, MVAL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVAL or PWV?

Over the 1-year period, PWV has performed better with a 27.69% return vs 15.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVAL or PWV?

MVAL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PWV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVAL or PWV?

MVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.73% for PWV.

What is the main difference between MVAL and PWV?

MVAL tracks Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PWV tracks Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MVAL and 0.58% for PWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.