PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVAL vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
-1.89%14.17%6.10%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
5.50%172.28%13.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's 5.50% return.


MVAL

1D
1.69%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
5.21%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXJ

1D
8.53%
1M
-23.14%
YTD
5.50%
6M
24.01%
1Y
114.70%
3Y*
47.55%
5Y*
22.70%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVAL vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVAL vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL
MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVALGDXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

2.27

-1.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

2.50

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.52

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

12.30

-8.22

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and GDXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVALGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

2.27

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.07

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and GDXJ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than GDXJ's 2.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
1.78%1.75%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.21%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and GDXJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-88.66%

+69.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-32.92%

+19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-23.14%

+12.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-60.91%

+57.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

9.43%

-5.72%

Volatility

MVAL vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is 4.52%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that MVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVALGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

20.63%

-16.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

42.33%

-32.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

50.75%

-31.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

40.56%

-24.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

44.45%

-28.87%