MUU vs. TMF
MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.01% expense ratio.
Performance
MUU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- 1Y
- -2.80%
- 3Y*
- -21.07%
- 5Y*
- -31.33%
- 10Y*
- -16.87%
MUU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUU and TMF is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMF
MUU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUU drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUU and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.28% | -92.89% | +66.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.28% | -92.11% | +65.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -43.76% | +33.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.26% | — |
Volatility
MUU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 295.32% | 27.91% | +267.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 46.59% | +248.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 295.32% | 43.86% | +251.46% |
MUU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MUU and TMF have an expense ratio of 1.01%.
Dividends
MUU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.09% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUU and TMF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU and TMF have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
MUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%).
Find the right allocation for MUU and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer